Pediatrics in Review
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by H, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by H, R. J.

Reader's Comments and Questions

R. J. H

I treasure comments such as these which readers send with their self-assessment sheets, because it is one of the few ways we have of knowing how well we serve them. I will be grateful if even more of you will send in your responses. But let me answer a few of the questions raised by readers:

Are the articles in Pediatrics in Review too long, too short, too complicated, too simple? Such questions are not easy to answer. We seek to provide a mixture of articles. Abstracts, which some readers believe are too short and simple because they do not explain the complexities of most of modern medicine, are used to address specific educational objectives, usually developed as part of the Recent Advances objectives.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pediatrics  Pediatrics in Review
Copyright © 1989 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.