Pediatrics in Review
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Pediatrics in Review. 1982;3:271-298.)
© 1982 American Academy of Pediatrics

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Tuberculosis Screening

The epidemiology of tuberculosis in a given community should be a major factor in determining tuberculosis screening programs. It can be argued that ideally every child should have a tuberculin skin test performed yearly, but the risk is so low in many suburban populations that the yield from such testing will be very low and the cost for each case found high. There is no question, however, about the need to have a systematic and complete screening in populations at high risk. These include inner city children, the socioeconomically disadvantaged, immigrants, health workers who come in contact with such populations, and all family and other close contacts of known cases. The tine test and other multiple skin puncture tests yield unacceptably high rates of false-positives and false-negatives. Intradermal tests are best, preferably with PPD, but of course these must be read by someone trained to evaluate reactions.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pediatrics  Pediatrics in Review
Copyright © 1982 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.