Pediatrics in Review
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Pediatrics in Review. 1984;5:238-247.)
© 1984 American Academy of Pediatrics

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berwick, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berwick, D. M.

Scoliosis Screening

Donald M. Berwick MD1
1 Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School; and Associate Director, Institute for Health Research, Harvard Community Health Plan, One Fenway Plaza, Boston, MA 02215

Scoliosis screening reduces the frequency of scoliosis surgery in a population, and probably leads, through early bracing, to a reduction in the degree of at least some serious curves. Its costs, however, are far from negligible. Even in the best of hands, a screening program induces costs and concerns in follow-up for many more children than it helps, and, if poorly administered, these induced costs can far outweigh the advantages to the screened population.

For the moment, until inexpensive and noninvasive follow-up methods are developed, it is probably advisable that children in the age range of 10 to 14 years be screened competently at least once, but with strict attention to the following principles:

1. Follow-up of those with positive results on screening should be suited to the age, sex, and risk factors for the individual child, and should minimize expense, roentgenogram ex-posure, and concern wherever possible.

2. Screening should be done by well-trained personnel who are fully aware of both the signs of significant curvature and of the costs and risk of inappropriate referral.

3. Screening programs should systematically assess the psychological morbidity of the labeling process in their target populations, and should modify their procedures accordingly if that morbidity is high.

4. Programs should be solidly linked to sound, prompt, and circumspect referral patterns—either primary care or specialty consultants. The mere "detection" of positive screening findings without assuring competent follow-up does not consitute effective screening.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pediatrics  Pediatrics in Review
Copyright © 1984 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.