Pediatrics in Review Note to Institutions for Site Subscriptions
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Pediatrics in Review. 1984;6:55-62.)
© 1984 American Academy of Pediatrics

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tebbi, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, A. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tebbi, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Freeman, A. I.

Osteogenic Sarcoma

Cameron K. Tebbi MD1
Arnold I. Freeman MD2
1 Director, Adolescent Unit, and Associate Chief, Department of Pediatrics, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY
2 Chief, Department of Pediatrics, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, and Professor of Pediatrics, State University of New York at Buffalo

Osteosarcoma is the commonest bone cancer seen in children and adolescents. Its peak incidence is during the adolescent growth spurt, and it occurs more frequently in taller individuals. The commonest site of occurrence is around the knee, ie, distal femur or proximal tibia. The classic presentation consists of pain and swelling at the tumor site. The tumor has a propensity to occur in the metaphyses of long bones, with destruction of normal bone as well as neoplastic new bone formation. Bone scans reveal the tumor.

The standard therapeutic approach has been amputation of the involved extremity with a resection line at least 10 cm above the most proximal extent of the tumor. Amputation alone has yielded a cure rate of approximately 20%. Recently, "limb salvage" (en bloc resection) with removal of the tumorous bone and replacement by a graft or endoprosthetic device has been used. This technique saves the limb but likely does not offer better function in the lower extremity and is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in the "salvaged" limb.

In the last 10 years, use of adjuvant chemotherapy may have improved the cure rate to approximately 50%, but this result is still being debated. For patients who have a limb amputation, an immediate fitting for a temporary prosthesis is best, later followed by a permanent prosthesis. Psychologic support is extremely important for these youngsters as they not only face the fear of death from cancer, but also of mutilation from therapy.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pediatrics  Pediatrics in Review
Copyright © 1984 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.