Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Complete Issue PDF
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Multimedia
    • Teaching Slides
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • CME/MOC
    • CME Quizzes
    • MOC Claiming
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Complete Issue PDF
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Multimedia
    • Teaching Slides
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • CME/MOC
    • CME Quizzes
    • MOC Claiming
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

Complementary, Holistic, and Integrative Medicine: St. John’s Wort

Theresa L. Charrois, Candace Sadler and Sunita Vohra
Pediatrics in Review February 2007, 28 (2) 69-72; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.28-2-69
Theresa L. Charrois
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Candace Sadler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sunita Vohra
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading
Download PDF
  1. Theresa L. Charrois, BScPharm, MSc*
  2. Candace Sadler*
  3. Sunita Vohra, MD, MSc*
  1. *Complementary and Alternative Research and Education (CARE) Program, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Canada, on behalf of the American Academy of Pediatrics Provisional Section on Complementary, Holistic, and Integrative Medicine

Introduction

St. John’s wort, derived from the Hypericaceae family, has played a medicinal role for thousands of years. (1) Although it has been used empirically for a wide range of ailments in the past, including skin conditions, nerve problems, and muscle pain, the primary uses currently are for depression and nervous conditions, (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7) due to its ability to inhibit the reuptake of dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine within the brain. (2)

Although promising evidence is emerging for the clinical use of St. John’s wort, data specific to pediatrics are still limited, warranting additional research.

Evidence of Efficacy in Pediatrics

Surveys in the United States and Britain of herbal use for the treatment of pediatric depression (8)(9) demonstrate that St. John’s wort is used commonly by children (22% and 9% in the two surveys, respectively). Formal evaluation of efficacy in pediatric populations is preliminary but shows some promise. Presently, no systematic reviews or randomized, controlled trials have been published regarding the use of St. John’s wort in children.

An open-label pilot study conducted by Findling and associates (10) analyzed the use of St. John’s wort in children between the ages of 6 and 16 years for treatment of major depressive disorder. The starting dose was 150 mg 3 times daily for 4 weeks. Exclusion criteria included failure to respond to 4 weeks of antidepressant therapy. Patients considered clinically nonresponsive to St. John’s wort (as per a priori criteria) after 4 weeks had their dosage increased to 300 mg 3 times daily. A total of 33 patients were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 10.5 years (SD, 2.9 y). At the end of the 8-week trial, 25 patients met the criteria of clinical response (76%). Also, 93% of the study population decided to continue therapy at the end of the 8-week study. Statistically significant improvements were documented in the two primary outcome measures (Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised and Children’s Depression Inventory) from baseline to 8 weeks. The major limitations of this study are that it was open-label, had no control group, had a small sample size, and had limited follow-up (8 wk).

In a prospective, open-label, outpatient study, Simeon and associates (11) investigated the efficacy of St. John’s wort in adolescents between 12 and 17 years of age (mean age, 14.8 y) who had major depressive disorders. Of the 26 patients enrolled, only 11 completed the 8-week study; the remaining 58% were either noncompliant or discontinued use due to continuing or worsening depression. Nine of the 11 compliant patients (82%) showed a significant clinical response, as indicated by the Clinical Global Improvement scores (either “very much improved” or “much improved”) at the final visit. The limitations of this study include its lack of a control group, small sample size, short follow-up period (8 wk), and open-label design.

In an observational study involving pediatric patients taking St. John’s wort for symptoms of depression, physicians and parents were asked to complete questionnaires about the efficacy and tolerability of the treatment. (12) Descriptive data were collected on 101 patients between the ages of 1 and 12 years (median age, 9 y). The median dose was 300 mg daily. Follow-up lasted 6 weeks, with physicians and parents reporting “excellent” efficacy in 55% of the patients. Although ratings of depressive symptoms improved over the course of the study, given the open-label, observational design, it is hard to interpret how clinically significant such improvements were. Physicians and parents did report high ratings of tolerability, but there were no descriptions of adverse events, and there was a high rate of losses to follow-up. Although 101 subjects were enrolled in the study, only 74 children were included in the final analysis. It is concerning that nine children dropped out during the trial, six of them because of inadequate therapeutic effects.

The data obtained from the previously cited studies show some promising results for the tolerability and potential efficacy of St. John’s wort in the treatment of depression in children. Better-designed research involving blinded controls is required to strengthen the findings.

Formal evaluation of St. John’s wort in the pediatric population includes its use in otitis media. (13) A randomized, controlled trial studying a combination product containing Hypericum perforatum in olive oil (as well as Allium sativum, Verbascum thapsus, and Calendula flores) found significant improvements in ear pain associated with otitis media in children between the ages of 6 and 18 years (n=103). This product was determined to be as effective as anesthetic ear drops in relieving ear pain.

Evidence of Safety

A systematic review analyzing the adverse effects associated with St. John’s wort in patients of all ages concluded that the herb is well tolerated in most individuals, with adverse events occurring in approximately 1% to 3% of patients. (14) The rates of adverse events were similar compared with placebo and less compared with other commonly prescribed antidepressants. Clinical studies have found that healthy individuals can tolerate St. John’s wort for up to 3 months. The adverse effects reported most commonly included gastrointestinal (GI) upset, fatigue, headache, restlessness, and dry mouth. Allergic skin reactions and increased photosensitization also have been identified, but evidence regarding the clinical relevance of these findings is conflicting. (1) (14) Fair- or sensitive-skinned individuals or those who have skin diseases should be cautioned about this possible risk. Potentially more serious adverse events, such as manic episodes, neuropathy, and serotonin syndrome, have been reported, but they were rare, and evidence is not clear whether St. John’s wort was the only contributing factor. (1)(14)

Studies analyzing the effects of St. John’s wort in the pediatric population found generally good tolerance for up to 8 weeks with appropriate doses. (10)(12) The most common adverse effects were dizziness, diarrhea, and change in appetite. (10)(12) Less commonly reported effects included constipation, headache, chills, GI discomfort, rash, fatigue, and photosensitivity. Treatment with St. John’s wort was found not to be associated with any clinically significant changes in weight, vital signs, or laboratory test results. (10) One case of worsening nervousness presented in the observational study, in which symptoms changed from “not present” at baseline to “mild” at 2 weeks. (12) Overall, the adverse events experienced in pediatric patients using St. John’s wort were mild and short-lived. Additional research is needed to determine the long-term safety of St. John’s wort use in children.

Pregnancy and Lactation

Sufficient evidence is lacking to recommend the use of St. John’s wort in women who are pregnant or lactating, and the drug is rated as being risk category C in pregnant women. (15) In two cases of St. John’s Wort use during human pregnancy, no immediate observable adverse effects were demonstrated. (16)

In terms of breastfeeding, one case report found that only hyperforin (not hypericin) was excreted in human milk after multiple sampling of both fore and hind milk. (17) Hypericin and hyperforin were immeasurable in the infant’s plasma. An observational cohort study was conducted in 33 breastfeeding women receiving St. John’s wort and 101 disease-matched controls as well as 33 age- and parity-matched nondisease controls. (18) The women were followed for 2 years, with no significant differences in adverse events. In the control infants, there was one case of colic; in the treatment group, there were two cases of colic, two cases of drowsiness, and one case of lethargy. No medical treatment was required for any of these reported events. No significant differences were found in relation to milk production or infant weight during the first postnatal year.

Drug Interactions

Numerous drug interactions are associated with St. John’s wort, and caution is warranted during its concomitant use with certain medications (Table⇓). The most significant interactions are the possible induction of serotonin syndrome when St. John’s wort is combined with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the induction of the CYP450 3A4 enzyme, which could reduce the plasma concentrations of drugs metabolized by this pathway. (14)(19) (20) Concomitant drugs of particular concern in a pediatric and adolescent population are cyclosporine, warfarin, oral contraceptives, protease inhibitors, and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. (14) (19)(20)(21)

DrugMechanismManagement
Carbamazepine (14)(19)(20)Decreased plasma concentrations due to the possible induction of CYP3A4 enzymeConcurrent use should be avoided. Laboratory monitoring of carbamazepine concentrations should be increased upon the start and end of St. John’s wort therapy.
Cyclosporine (14)(19)(20)Decreased plasma concentrations due to the possible induction of CYP3A4 enzymeConcurrent use should be avoided. If used concurrently, cyclosporine concentrations should be followed.
Protease Inhibitors and Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (14)(19)(20)Decreased plasma concentrations due to the possible induction of CYP3A4 enzyme and P-glycoproteinConcurrent use should be avoided.
Oral Contraceptives (14)(19)(20)(21)Increased metabolism of oral contraceptivePatients should be counseled to monitor for breakthrough bleeding and advised to use an alternative method of birth control.
Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) (14)(19)(20)Increased risk of developing symptoms of central serotonin syndrome due to the possible additive effect on serotonin reuptake by hyperforinPatients should be counseled on the potential signs/symptoms of serotonin syndrome (nausea, headache, agitation, confusion, fever, insomnia). The concomitant use of St. John’s wort with SSRIs should be approached with caution.
Warfarin (14)(19)(20)Reduced plasma concentrations of warfarin due to the possible induction of CYP2C9 enzyme and P-glycoprotein; increased risk of thromboembolic eventsPatients using warfarin should be advised to avoid St. John’s wort. If used concurrently, increased INR monitoring and follow-up is advised. Patients should be counseled on the signs and symptoms of thromboembolic events.
Table.

Summary of Drug Interactions With St. John’s Wort

Although several drug interactions associated with St. John’s wort have been reported, no clinical reports of these interactions are available within the pediatric population. Encouraging parents to report the use of St. John’s wort in their children is imperative to assess the safety of concomitant medication use.

Pharmacologic Action

The multiple constituents of St. John’s wort identified as potential active ingredients include naphthodianthrones, flavonoids, and xanthones. Most preparations are standardized to hypericin content (a naphthodianthrone), but recent data indicate other active ingredients, including hyperforin. (22) (23) The precise mechanisms of action are not known and are being debated. Irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitory activity noted in vitro has not been observed in vivo. Other postulated mechanisms include selective inhibition of serotonin, gamma-aminobutyrate, norepinephrine, and dopamine reuptake in the central nervous system. (1) (24). Studies also have identified antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory actions in association with St. John’s wort, although details are scarce on the exact mechanisms. (2)(4)

Administration/Dosage Forms

Commercially available extracts of St. John’s wort are manufactured as capsules, tablets, or caplets. (2) Studies conducted with pediatric patients have found good tolerance with doses ranging from 300 to 900 mg/d in divided doses for up to 8 weeks. (10)(12)

Although most product labels state that the extract is standardized to 0.3% hypericin content, additional evaluation suggests that this concentration may vary considerably. (23) Patients should be cautioned to consider this variance when selecting an appropriate product.

Conclusion

Although preliminary data suggest efficacy and tolerability of St. John’s wort for the treatment of depression in children, additional research with better study designs is needed to support using this agent as an antidepressant in the pediatric population. Clinicians must inquire as to whether families are giving this agent to their depressed children.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Wendy Weber (Bastyr Center for Natural Health) for her constructive feedback.

Footnotes

  • Author Disclosure

    Ms Charrois and Sadler did not disclose any financial relationships relevant to this article. Dr Vohra is an Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Population Health Investigator and a recipient of a Canadian Institute of Health Research New Investigator Award.

References

  1. ↵
    Natural medicines monograph. Hypericum perforum. Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database 2006. Available at: www.naturaldatabase.com
  2. ↵
    Ernst E. The risk-benefit profile of commonly used herbal therapies: gingko, St. John’s wort, ginseng, Echinacea, saw palmetto and kava. Ann Intern Med.2002;136 :42– 53
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Linde K, Berner M, Egger M, Mulrow C. St. John’s wort for depression: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;186 :99– 107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Kobak KA, Taylor LV, Warner G, Futterer R. St. John’s wort versus placebo in social phobia: results from a placebo-controlled pilot study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005;25 :51– 58
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Kobak KA, Taylor LV, Bystritsky A, et al. St. John’s wort versus placebo in obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from a double-blind study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005;20 :299– 304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Martinez B, Kasper S, Ruhrmann S, Moller HJ. Hypericum in the treatment of seasonal affective disorders. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2004;7 :S29– S33
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    Hicks SM, Walker AF, Gallagher J, Middleton RW, Wright J. The significance of “nonsignificance” in randomized controlled studies: a discussion inspired by a double-blinded study on St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L) for premenstrual symptoms. J Altern Complement Med. 2004;10 :925– 932
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Cala S, Crismon ML, Baumgartner J. A survey of herbal use in children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder or depression. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23 :222– 307
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Redvers A, Kanagaratnam G. How many patients self-medicate with St John’s wort? Psychiatr Bull. 2001;25 :254– 256
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Findling RL, McNamara NK, O’Riordan MA, et al. An open-label pilot study of St. John’s wort in juvenile depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003;42 :908– 914
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Simeon J, Nixon MK, Milin R, Jovanovic R, Walker S. Open-label pilot study of St. John’s wort in adolescent depression. J Clin Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2005;15 :293– 301
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    Hubner WD, Kirste T. Experience with St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) in children under 12 years with symptoms of depression and psychovegetative disturbances. Phytother Res. 2001;15 :367– 370
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Sarrell EM, Mandelberg A, Cohen HA. Efficacy of naturopathic extracts in the management of ear pain associated with acute otitis media. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155 :796– 799
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Hammerness P, Basch E, Ulbricht C, et al. St. John’s wort: a systematic review of adverse effects and drug interactions for the consultation psychiatrist. Psychosomatics. 2003;44 :271– 282
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Yaffee SJ. Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk. 7th ed. London, Great Britain: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005
  16. ↵
    Grush LR, Nierenberg A, Keefe B, Cohen LS. St. John’s wort during pregnancy. JAMA. 1998;280 :1566
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Klier CM, Schmid-Siegel B, Schafer MR, et al. St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) and breastfeeding: plasma and breast milk concentrations of hyperforin for 5 mothers and 2 infants. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67 :305– 309
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Lee A, Minhas R, Matsuda N, Lam H, Ito S. The safety of St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) during breastfeeding. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 :966– 968
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Izzo AA, Ernst E. Interactions between herbal medicines and prescribed drugs: a systematic review. Drugs. 2001;61 :2163– 2175
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Mills E, Wu P, Johnston BC, Gallicano K, Clarke M, Guyatt G. Natural health product-drug interactions: a systematic review of clinical trials. Ther Drug Monit. 2005;27 :549– 557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Murphy PA. St. John’s wort and oral contraceptives: reasons for concern? J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002;47 :447– 450
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Wurglics M, Schubert-Zsilavecz M. Hypericum perforatum: a “modern” herbal antidepressant: pharmacokinetics of active ingredients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45 :449– 468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Shah AK, Avery BA, Wyandt CM. Content analysis and stability evaluation of selected commercial preparations of St. John’s wort. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2005;31 :907– 916
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Markowitz JS, Donovan JL, DeVane CL, et al. Effect of St John’s wort on drug metabolism by induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. JAMA. 2003;290 :1500– 1504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics in Review: 28 (2)
Pediatrics in Review
Vol. 28, Issue 2
February 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Complementary, Holistic, and Integrative Medicine: St. John’s Wort
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Complementary, Holistic, and Integrative Medicine: St. John’s Wort
Theresa L. Charrois, Candace Sadler, Sunita Vohra
Pediatrics in Review Feb 2007, 28 (2) 69-72; DOI: 10.1542/pir.28-2-69

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Complementary, Holistic, and Integrative Medicine: St. John’s Wort
Theresa L. Charrois, Candace Sadler, Sunita Vohra
Pediatrics in Review Feb 2007, 28 (2) 69-72; DOI: 10.1542/pir.28-2-69
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Evidence of Efficacy in Pediatrics
    • Evidence of Safety
    • Pregnancy and Lactation
    • Drug Interactions
    • Pharmacologic Action
    • Administration/Dosage Forms
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Pediatric Integrative Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Accidents Waiting to Happen: A Review of Unintentional Household Injuries in Children
  • Early Signs and Symptoms of Leukodystrophies: A Case-Based Guide
  • Epidemiology, Prevention, and Sequelae of Drowning
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Psychiatry/Psychology
    • Psychiatry/Psychology
  • Medical Education
    • Research Methods & Statistics
  • Complementary & Integrative Medicine
    • Complementary & Integrative Medicine
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • ABP Content Specifications Map
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics