Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Complete Issue PDF
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Multimedia
    • Teaching Slides
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • CME/MOC
    • CME Quizzes
    • MOC Claiming
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Complete Issue PDF
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Multimedia
    • Teaching Slides
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • CME/MOC
    • CME Quizzes
    • MOC Claiming
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

Ethics for the Pediatrician

Just Distribution of Health-care Resources and the Neonatal ICU

Charles C. Camosy
Pediatrics in Review May 2011, 32 (5) 204-207; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.32-5-204
Charles C. Camosy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Download PDF
  1. Charles C. Camosy, PhD*
  1. *Department of Theology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY.
  • Author Disclosure

    Dr Camosy has disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.

Objectives

After completing this article, readers should be able to:

  1. Explore some implications of the finite nature of human beings (as exemplified by sickness and mortality) and of resources, both for medicine in general and the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in particular.

  2. Explain the refusal to discriminate on the basis of disability for even the sickest members of the NICU population.

  3. Show how taking cost into consideration, at both macro and clinical levels, does not violate human dignity.

  4. Respond to arguments that NICU care is among the most cost-effective in medicine.

  5. Suggest future strategies for combating a culture of overtreatment in the NICU.

Introduction

The debate over health-care reform in the United States brought discussions of “comprehensive health benefits” and “cost containment measures” to the dinner tables of average Americans. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) faced this issue in 1998: (1)

“The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advocates universal and insured financial access to quality health care for all newborns, infants, children, adolescents, young adults through age 21 years, and pregnant women … Such insurance should provide a comprehensive benefit package that should include, but not be limited to, pregnancy related services, preventive care services recommended by the AAP, acute and chronic care services, and emergency care services.”

In this same statement, the AAP acknowledged that:

“Cost containment is essential but must not impair the quality of care delivered. Physicians must play an important role in establishing principles of evidence-based medicine, validating the measurements used, and ensuring quality in any cost-containment process. Responsibility for controlling costs should be a combined responsibility of employers, families, clinicians, payers, and administrators of health …

Individual Login

Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.

Institutional Login

via Institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your librarian or administrator if you do not have a username and password.

Log in through your institution

If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Offer Reprints

PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics in Review: 32 (5)
Pediatrics in Review
Vol. 32, Issue 5
1 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ethics for the Pediatrician
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Ethics for the Pediatrician
Charles C. Camosy
Pediatrics in Review May 2011, 32 (5) 204-207; DOI: 10.1542/pir.32-5-204

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Ethics for the Pediatrician
Charles C. Camosy
Pediatrics in Review May 2011, 32 (5) 204-207; DOI: 10.1542/pir.32-5-204
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Objectives
    • Introduction
    • The Moral Status of Neonates
    • Taking Cost into Consideration
    • Why Pick on the NICU?
    • Some Tentative Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Neonatal Bioethical Perspectives: Practice Considerations
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Review of Scabies Infestation and Selected Common Cutaneous Infections
  • Pediatric Ingestions: New High-Risk Household Hazards
  • Iron Deficiency: Implications Before Anemia
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Fetus/Newborn Infant
    • Fetus/Newborn Infant
  • Ethics/Bioethics
    • Ethics/Bioethics
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • ABP Content Specifications Map
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics