Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Complete Issue PDF
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Multimedia
    • Teaching Slides
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • CME/MOC
    • CME Quizzes
    • MOC Claiming
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Complete Issue PDF
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Multimedia
    • Teaching Slides
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • CME/MOC
    • CME Quizzes
    • MOC Claiming
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
American Academy of Pediatrics
Article

Ethics for the Pediatrician

Obstetric Conflict: When Fetal and Maternal Interests Are at Odds

Susan F. Townsend
Pediatrics in Review January 2012, 33 (1) 33-37; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.33-1-33
Susan F. Townsend
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • Quiz
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Download PDF
  1. Susan F. Townsend, MD, FAAP*
  1. *Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, UC Denver School of Medicine; Affiliate Faculty, Program in Bioethics, UC Denver, Denver, CO
  • Author Disclosure

    Dr Townsend has disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.

Introduction

Emerging therapies today offer the promise of treatment for “fetal patients.” Because of this focus, fetal interests have increasingly been considered separately from maternal interests by clinicians, policy makers, and the bioethics community. Nonetheless, pregnancy creates a unique circumstance in medical ethics because the fetus can be accessed only through intervention on the pregnant woman. Although maternal and fetal interests usually are aligned, care of the fetus is intertwined with and dependent on care of the pregnant woman, and at times conflict can arise between fetal and maternal interests. This circumstance is termed “obstetric” or “maternal-fetal” conflict. These are emotionally laden issues that involve protecting the rights of women and the best interests of the fetus. This review will outline some ethical constructs that may be used to help resolve such conflicts.

Ethical Frameworks Used to Resolve Obstetric Conflicts

When conflict arises between maternal and fetal interests (eg, refusing a cesarean delivery for fetal distress, or treatment of cancer during pregnancy that could result in fetal death), more than one ethical theory may be useful to aid decision-making. (1) Principle-based theories use the principles of respect for patient autonomy, beneficence/nonmaleficence, and justice to guide conflict resolution. (2) Other helpful approaches to obstetric conflict, in particular, include feminist theory and the ethics of care. (1)(3) Because of the emotionally laden issues involved in protecting both the rights of women and the best interests of the fetus, conflicts often are approached best by using a comprehensive analysis that incorporates a variety of perspectives. Pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists who care for the child after delivery can play an important role in helping provide perspective about potential fetal outcomes.

Feminist theory …

Individual Login

Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.

Institutional Login

via Institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your librarian or administrator if you do not have a username and password.

Log in through your institution

If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Offer Reprints

PreviousNext
Back to top

Advertising Disclaimer »

In this issue

Pediatrics in Review: 33 (1)
Pediatrics in Review
Vol. 33, Issue 1
1 Jan 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View this article with LENS
PreviousNext
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ethics for the Pediatrician
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Request Permissions
Article Alerts
Log in
You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Ethics for the Pediatrician
Susan F. Townsend
Pediatrics in Review Jan 2012, 33 (1) 33-37; DOI: 10.1542/pir.33-1-33

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Quiz
Share
Ethics for the Pediatrician
Susan F. Townsend
Pediatrics in Review Jan 2012, 33 (1) 33-37; DOI: 10.1542/pir.33-1-33
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Print
Download PDF
Insight Alerts
  • Table of Contents

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Introduction
    • Ethical Frameworks Used to Resolve Obstetric Conflicts
    • Refusal of Intervention: Declining Cesarean Delivery for Fetal Distress
    • Other Considerations in Obstetric Conflict
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
  • Quiz

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reviewing the womb
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Review of Scabies Infestation and Selected Common Cutaneous Infections
  • Pediatric Ingestions: New High-Risk Household Hazards
  • Iron Deficiency: Implications Before Anemia
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Fetus/Newborn Infant
    • Fetus/Newborn Infant
  • Ethics/Bioethics
    • Ethics/Bioethics
  • Journal Info
  • Editorial Board
  • ABP Content Specifications Map
  • Overview
  • Licensing Information
  • Authors
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit My Manuscript
  • Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions
  • Usage Stats
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Media Kit
  • About
  • International Access
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • FAQ
  • AAP.org
  • shopAAP
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
  • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
  • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
American Academy of Pediatrics

© 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics