Skip to main content

Advertising Disclaimer »

Main menu

  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Complete Issue PDF
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Multimedia
    • Teaching Slides
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • CME/MOC
    • CME Quizzes
    • MOC Claiming
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
  • Other Publications
    • American Academy of Pediatrics

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Academy of Pediatrics

AAP Gateway

Advanced Search

AAP Logo

  • Log in
  • Journals
    • Pediatrics
    • Hospital Pediatrics
    • Pediatrics in Review
    • NeoReviews
    • AAP Grand Rounds
    • AAP News
  • Authors
    • Submit Manuscript
    • Author Guidelines
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Complete Issue PDF
    • Archive
    • Topic/Program Collections
    • Blog
  • Multimedia
    • Teaching Slides
    • Pediatrics On Call Podcast
  • CME/MOC
    • CME Quizzes
    • MOC Claiming
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Careers
American Academy of Pediatrics
Online-only Article

The Slow, Steady Development of Pediatric Ethics Committees, 1975-2013

Doug Myers and John Lantos
Pediatrics in Review March 2014, 35 (3) e15-e19; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.35-3-e15
Doug Myers
*Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplant, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Lantos
†Children’s Mercy Bioethics Center and Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas, Kansas City, MO.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Comments
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Download PDF
  1. Doug Myers, MD*
  2. John Lantos, MD†
  1. *Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Bone Marrow Transplant, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, MO.
  2. †Children’s Mercy Bioethics Center and Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas, Kansas City, MO.
  • Author Disclosure

    Drs Myers and Lantos have disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.

  • Abbreviations:
    ICRC:
    infant care review committee
    IEC:
    institutional ethics committee
  • During the last 30 years, most children’s hospitals in the United States have created pediatric ethics committees or other formal methods to address the ethical issues that arise in the clinical practice of tertiary care pediatrics. Ethics committees or consultants are called on to advise physicians, nurses, other health care professionals, and parents in cases that raise controversial ethical issues. They take many forms and use many different processes to identify and resolve ethical dilemmas.

    Such committees have themselves been somewhat controversial. On the surface, they seem to be well accepted. They are endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, (1) by the Joint Commission, (2) and in many legal decisions. (3) Although well accepted by many physicians and nurses, ethics committees are only consulted approximately once a month or less in most children’s hospitals. (4)

    In this article, we review the history of pediatric ethics committees, discuss their roles, and examine some critiques of ethics committees. We then discuss attempts to define the process of ethics consultation and measure the quality of such consultations. We conclude with a tentative agenda for future research on the efficacy of pediatric ethics committees.

    Pediatric Ethics Committees: A (Very) Brief History

    The idea of hospital ethics committees was first proposed by a pediatrician. In 1975, Dr Karen Teel, a Texas pediatrician, published a short article in the Baylor Law Review. (5) She chose to publish in a law journal rather than a medical journal, suggesting that the climate at the time within medicine was not receptive to the idea of committees to review the ethics of clinical decisions. Clinical-ethical issues were seen more as dilemmas for the legal …

    Individual Login

    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.

    Institutional Login

    via Institution

    You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your librarian or administrator if you do not have a username and password.

    Log in through your institution

    If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

    Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 days for US$25.00

    Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

    Offer Reprints

    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    Advertising Disclaimer »

    In this issue

    Pediatrics in Review: 35 (3)
    Pediatrics in Review
    Vol. 35, Issue 3
    1 Mar 2014
    • Table of Contents
    • Table of Contents (PDF)
    • About the Cover
    • Index by author
    • Complete Issue (PDF)
    View this article with LENS
    PreviousNext
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Academy of Pediatrics.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    The Slow, Steady Development of Pediatric Ethics Committees, 1975-2013
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Academy of Pediatrics
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Academy of Pediatrics web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Request Permissions
    Article Alerts
    Log in
    You will be redirected to aap.org to login or to create your account.
    Or Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Citation Tools
    The Slow, Steady Development of Pediatric Ethics Committees, 1975-2013
    Doug Myers, John Lantos
    Pediatrics in Review Mar 2014, 35 (3) e15-e19; DOI: 10.1542/pir.35-3-e15

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Share
    The Slow, Steady Development of Pediatric Ethics Committees, 1975-2013
    Doug Myers, John Lantos
    Pediatrics in Review Mar 2014, 35 (3) e15-e19; DOI: 10.1542/pir.35-3-e15
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Print
    Download PDF
    Insight Alerts
    • Table of Contents

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Pediatric Ethics Committees: A (Very) Brief History
      • The Human Rights Committee at the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh
      • The Legacy of Baby Doe
      • Critiques of Ethics Committees
      • Three Examples of Professional Regulation and Study of Ethics Committees
      • References
    • Info & Metrics
    • Comments

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • Paediatric clinical ethics in Australia and New Zealand: a survey
    • What kinds of cases do paediatricians refer to clinical ethics? Insights from 184 case referrals at an Australian paediatric hospital
    • Google Scholar

    More in this TOC Section

    • Visual Diagnosis: Chronic Diarrhea and Failure to Thrive in a 5-Year-Old Girl
    • Visual Diagnosis: Nasal Congestion and Respiratory Distress in a 7-Day-Old Girl
    • Visual Diagnosis: 6-Month-Old Boy With Strange Body Movements
    Show more Online-Only Article

    Similar Articles

    Subjects

    • Ethics/Bioethics
      • Ethics/Bioethics
    • Journal Info
    • Editorial Board
    • ABP Content Specifications Map
    • Overview
    • Licensing Information
    • Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Submit My Manuscript
    • Librarians
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Usage Stats
    • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    • Resources
    • Media Kit
    • About
    • International Access
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Statement
    • FAQ
    • AAP.org
    • shopAAP
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Instagram
    • Visit American Academy of Pediatrics on Facebook
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Twitter
    • Follow American Academy of Pediatrics on Youtube
    American Academy of Pediatrics

    © 2021 American Academy of Pediatrics